951 Real Jobs, and a Ministry That Says Jobs Are Not Its Job: Exposing the Empty Arithmetic Behind the 500,000 Jobs Promise
Updated: Oct 12
The government continues to parade grand employment figures, yet official parliamentary replies expose a glaring chasm between political rhetoric and economic reality. In response to Question 181, the Ministry of International Relations and Trade claimed 9,343 permanent jobs across 28 development projects, yet its own tables show that only 951 actual permanent jobs have been created. From N$66.85 billion in announced investments, a mere N$7.74 billion is recorded as actually invested.
The numbers collapse under even basic scrutiny. The largest single project listed, Hylron Phase 1 at Walvis Bay, accounts for N$37.23 billion and 4,000 permanent jobs, yet not a single cent has been invested and not a single worker has been employed. The ministry's data is riddled with internal contradictions, including a Lüderitz school misclassified under digital services, kelp farms credited with 92 jobs on a fraction of their announced budget, and multi-billion-dollar discrepancies across project lines. Most absurdly, the Ministry stated that it is "not directly involved in job creation", even while taking credit for thousands of unverified positions on paper.
The arithmetic is entirely unforgiving for ordinary Namibians seeking a livelihood. Delivering 500,000 jobs in five years requires 100,000 jobs annually, or roughly 274 every single day. The 951 real jobs the Ministry could actually verify amount to less than four days of the President's promised pace, leaving the 9,343 paper figures at under two percent of the target. A fitter in Walvis Bay or a seasonal grape picker in Aussenkher cannot survive on a column of empty projections.
What the country needs is ordinary, disciplined work: a dated, quarterly register tracking project-by-project employment verified strictly against Social Security records, the removal of bureaucratic red tape stalling capital, and targeted support for high-hiring sectors like agro-processing. Government does not need a bigger number; it needs a truer one. The IPC will continue to hold executive authorities strictly accountable to real jobs rather than development theatre.
Comments